Last data update: May 28, 2024. (Total: 46864 publications since 2009)
Records 1-6 (of 6 Records) |
Query Trace: Bemis K[original query] |
---|
Correlation of wastewater surveillance data with traditional influenza surveillance measures in Cook County, Illinois, October 2022-April 2023
Faherty EAG , Yuce D , Korban C , Bemis K , Kowalski R , Gretsch S , Ramirez E , Poretsky R , Packman A , Leisman KP , Pierce M , Kittner A , Teran R , Pacilli M . Sci Total Environ 2023 912 169551 Influenza is a respiratory illness that can result in serious outcomes, particularly among persons who are immunocompromised, aged <5 years or aged >65 years. Traditional influenza surveillance approaches rely upon syndromic surveillance of emergency departments and public health reporting from clinicians and laboratories. Wastewater surveillance infrastructure developed to monitor SARS-CoV-2 is being used for influenza surveillance in the Chicago area. The goal was to evaluate timeliness and correlations between influenza virus detected through wastewater surveillance and traditional influenza surveillance measures to assess utility of wastewater surveillance for influenza at the county level. Specifically, we measured correlations between influenza virus gene copies in wastewater samples and 1) the number of intensive care unit admissions associated with a diagnosis of influenza, 2) the percentage emergency department (ED) visits for influenza-like-illness, and 3) the percentage of ED visits with influenza diagnosis at discharge(2) in Cook County. Influenza concentrations in wastewater were strongly correlated with traditional influenza surveillance measures, particularly for catchment areas serving >100,000 residents. Wastewater indicators lagged traditional influenza surveillance measures by approximately one week when analyzed in cross-correlations. Although wastewater data lagged traditional influenza surveillance measures in this analysis, it can serve as a useful surveillance tool as a complement to syndromic surveillance; it is a form of influenza surveillance that does not rely on healthcare-seeking behavior or reporting by healthcare providers. |
2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for Exercise, Rehabilitation, Diet, and Additional Integrative Interventions for Rheumatoid Arthritis
England BR , Smith BJ , Baker NA , Barton JL , Oatis CA , Guyatt G , Anandarajah A , Carandang K , Chan KK , Constien D , Davidson E , Dodge CV , Bemis-Dougherty A , Everett S , Fisher N , Fraenkel L , Goodman SM , Lewis J , Menzies V , Moreland LW , Navarro-Millan I , Patterson S , Phillips LR , Shah N , Singh N , White D , AlHeresh R , Barbour KE , Bye T , Guglielmo D , Haberman R , Johnson T , Kleiner A , Lane CY , Li LC , Master H , Pinto D , Poole JL , Steinbarger K , Sztubinski D , Thoma L , Tsaltskan V , Turgunbaev M , Wells C , Turner AS , Treadwell JR . Arthritis Rheumatol 2023 75 (8) 1299-1311 OBJECTIVE: To develop initial American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines on the use of exercise, rehabilitation, diet, and additional interventions in conjunction with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as part of an integrative management approach for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: An interprofessional guideline development group constructed clinically relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) questions. A literature review team then completed a systematic literature review and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate the certainty of evidence. An interprofessional Voting Panel (n = 20 participants) that included 3 individuals with RA achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS: The Voting Panel achieved consensus on 28 recommendations for the use of integrative interventions in conjunction with DMARDs for the management of RA. Consistent engagement in exercise received a strong recommendation. Of 27 conditional recommendations, 4 pertained to exercise, 13 to rehabilitation, 3 to diet, and 7 to additional integrative interventions. These recommendations are specific to RA management, recognizing that other medical indications and general health benefits may exist for many of these interventions. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides initial ACR recommendations on integrative interventions for the management of RA to accompany DMARD treatments. The broad range of interventions included in these recommendations illustrates the importance of an interprofessional, team-based approach to RA management. The conditional nature of most recommendations requires clinicians to engage persons with RA in shared decision-making when applying these recommendations. |
2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for exercise, rehabilitation, diet, and additional integrative interventions for rheumatoid arthritis
England BR , Smith BJ , Baker NA , Barton JL , Oatis CA , Guyatt G , Anandarajah A , Carandang K , Chan KK , Constien D , Davidson E , Dodge CV , Bemis-Dougherty A , Everett S , Fisher N , Fraenkel L , Goodman SM , Lewis J , Menzies V , Moreland LW , Navarro-Millan I , Patterson S , Phillips LR , Shah N , Singh N , White D , AlHeresh R , Barbour KE , Bye T , Guglielmo D , Haberman R , Johnson T , Kleiner A , Lane CY , Li LC , Master H , Pinto D , Poole JL , Steinbarger K , Sztubinski D , Thoma L , Tsaltskan V , Turgunbaev M , Wells C , Turner AS , Treadwell JR . Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023 75 (8) 1603-1615 OBJECTIVE: To develop initial American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines on the use of exercise, rehabilitation, diet, and additional interventions in conjunction with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as part of an integrative management approach for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: An interprofessional guideline development group constructed clinically relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) questions. A literature review team then completed a systematic literature review and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate the certainty of evidence. An interprofessional Voting Panel (n = 20 participants) that included 3 individuals with RA achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS: The Voting Panel achieved consensus on 28 recommendations for the use of integrative interventions in conjunction with DMARDs for the management of RA. Consistent engagement in exercise received a strong recommendation. Of 27 conditional recommendations, 4 pertained to exercise, 13 to rehabilitation, 3 to diet, and 7 to additional integrative interventions. These recommendations are specific to RA management, recognizing that other medical indications and general health benefits may exist for many of these interventions. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides initial ACR recommendations on integrative interventions for the management of RA to accompany DMARD treatments. The broad range of interventions included in these recommendations illustrates the importance of an interprofessional, team-based approach to RA management. The conditional nature of most recommendations requires clinicians to engage persons with RA in shared decision-making when applying these recommendations. |
Evidence for Limited Early Spread of COVID-19 Within the United States, January-February 2020.
CDC COVID-19 Response Team , Jorden MA , Rudman SL , Villarino E , Hoferka S , Patel MT , Bemis K , Simmons CR , Jespersen M , Iberg Johnson J , Mytty E , Arends KD , Henderson JJ , Mathes RW , Weng CX , Duchin J , Lenahan J , Close N , Bedford T , Boeckh M , Chu HY , Englund JA , Famulare M , Nickerson DA , Rieder MJ , Shendure J , Starita LM , Armstrong Gregory L , Butler Jay C , Coletta Michael A , Kite-Powell Aaron , Bhatnagar Julu , Reagan-Steiner Sarah , Tong Suxiang , Flannery Brendan , Ferdinands Jill M , Chung Jessie R . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020 69 (22) 680-684 From January 21 through February 23, 2020, public health agencies detected 14 U.S. cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), all related to travel from China (1,2). The first nontravel-related U.S. case was confirmed on February 26 in a California resident who had become ill on February 13 (3). Two days later, on February 28, a second nontravel-related case was confirmed in the state of Washington (4,5). Examination of four lines of evidence provides insight into the timing of introduction and early transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, into the United States before the detection of these two cases. First, syndromic surveillance based on emergency department records from counties affected early by the pandemic did not show an increase in visits for COVID-19-like illness before February 28. Second, retrospective SARS-CoV-2 testing of approximately 11,000 respiratory specimens from several U.S. locations beginning January 1 identified no positive results before February 20. Third, analysis of viral RNA sequences from early cases suggested that a single lineage of virus imported directly or indirectly from China began circulating in the United States between January 18 and February 9, followed by several SARS-CoV-2 importations from Europe. Finally, the occurrence of three cases, one in a California resident who died on February 6, a second in another resident of the same county who died February 17, and a third in an unidentified passenger or crew member aboard a Pacific cruise ship that left San Francisco on February 11, confirms cryptic circulation of the virus by early February. These data indicate that sustained, community transmission had begun before detection of the first two nontravel-related U.S. cases, likely resulting from the importation of a single lineage of virus from China in late January or early February, followed by several importations from Europe. The widespread emergence of COVID-19 throughout the United States after February highlights the importance of robust public health systems to respond rapidly to emerging infectious threats. |
Spatial clusters of latent tuberculous infection, Connecticut, 2010-2014
Mullins J , Lobato MN , Bemis K , Sosa L . Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2018 22 (2) 165-170 SETTING: In the United States, tuberculosis (TB) control is increasingly focusing on the identification of persons with latent tuberculous infection (LTBI). OBJECTIVE : To characterize the local epidemiology of LTBI in Connecticut, USA. METHODS : We used spatial analyses 1) to identify census tract-level clusters of reported LTBI and TB disease in Connecticut, 2) to compare persons and populations in clusters with those not in clusters, and 3) to compare persons with LTBI to those with TB disease. RESULT S : Significant census tract-level spatial clusters of LTBI and TB disease were identified. Compared with persons with LTBI in non-clustered census tracts, those in clustered census tracts were more likely to be foreignborn and less likely to be of white non-Hispanic ethnicity. Populations in census tract clusters of high LTBI prevalence had greater crowding, persons living in poverty, and persons lacking health care insurance than populations not in clustered census tracts. Persons with LTBI were less likely than those with TB disease to be of Asian ethnicity, and persons with LTBI were more likely than those with TB disease to reside in a clustered census tract. CONCLUS IONS : Characterizing fine-scale populations at risk for LTBI supports effective and culturally accessible screening and treatment programs. |
Civil surgeon tuberculosis evaluations for foreign-born persons seeking permanent U.S. residence
Bemis K , Thornton A , Rodriguez-Lainz A , Lowenthal P , Escobedo M , Sosa LE , Tibbs A , Sharnprapai S , Moser KS , Cochran J , Lobato MN . J Immigr Minor Health 2015 18 (2) 301-7 Foreign-born persons in the United States seeking to adjust their status to permanent resident must undergo screening for tuberculosis (TB) disease. Screening is performed by civil surgeons (CS) following technical instructions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. From 2011 to 2012, 1,369 practicing CS in California, Texas, and New England were surveyed to investigate adherence to the instructions. A descriptive analysis was conducted on 907 (66 %) respondents. Of 907 respondents, 739 (83 %) had read the instructions and 565 (63 %) understood that a chest radiograph is required for status adjustors with TB symptoms; however, only 326 (36 %) knew that a chest radiograph is required for immunosuppressed status adjustors. When suspecting TB disease, 105 (12 %) would neither report nor refer status adjustors to the health department; 91 (10 %) would neither start treatment nor refer for TB infection. Most CS followed aspects of the technical instructions; however, educational opportunities are warranted to ensure positive patient outcomes. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:May 28, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure